If a project requires rapid prototyping and frequent feedback, which instructional design approach is most suitable?

If a project requires rapid prototyping and frequent feedback, which instructional design approach is most suitable?

• A. ADDIE
• B. SAM
• C. Both equally suitable
• D. Neither

Answer: (B)

Rapid prototyping and frequent feedback work best when design cycles are short, iterative, and guided by real input from stakeholders. The Successive Approximation Model is built around quick, repeated cycles of design, build, test, and refine. Each cycle delivers a workable prototype and gathers feedback to inform the next iteration, allowing rapid adjustments and faster overall progress. ADDIE, in its traditional form, follows a more linear sequence: analyze, design, develop, implement, and evaluate. Feedback and changes tend to flow through these phases more slowly, which can bottleneck rapid prototyping and frequent stakeholder input. So for a project demanding fast prototyping and continual feedback, SAM is the superior fit.

Rapid prototyping and frequent feedback work best when design cycles are short, iterative, and guided by real input from stakeholders. The Successive Approximation Model is built around quick, repeated cycles of design, build, test, and refine. Each cycle delivers a workable prototype and gathers feedback to inform the next iteration, allowing rapid adjustments and faster overall progress.

ADDIE, in its traditional form, follows a more linear sequence: analyze, design, develop, implement, and evaluate. Feedback and changes tend to flow through these phases more slowly, which can bottleneck rapid prototyping and frequent stakeholder input.

So for a project demanding fast prototyping and continual feedback, SAM is the superior fit.